The filter prototype, tested in Al Haouz, a rural district about 40 kilometres from Marrakech, removed a large amount of waste such as solid particles, organic pollution, nitrogen and fertiliser residue. The system was also successful at killing off coliform bacteria and other pathogens in the water including faecal matter, E.coli and streptococci bacteria.
“The cost of this technology is very low compared with systems like lagoon filters, wetlands and sand filters”
The filter system consists of a two-stage process that can be easily assembled with local material in water barrels. The researchers created filter ‘bricks’ from sandy soil, charcoal, sawdust and iron scraps, and packed these into the barrels with gravel. While running through the barrel, the water is filtered alternatively by the bricks and the gravel.
The experiment’s results were published on 13 October in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. Laila Mandi, a researcher at Morocco’s Cadi Ayyad University and lead author of the paper, said the soil bricks on their own were good enough to filter organic waste and nutrients from the water. But when combined with the gravel, the two-stage system became effective enough to tackle pathogens.
She said the system could provide cheap and low-tech water filtration to rural, arid areas. “The cost of this technology is very low compared with systems like lagoon filters, wetlands and sand filters,” Mandi said. It also has benefits such as simple maintenance, no frequent clogging and no energy requirements, she added. The expected lifetime of each filter system, if correctly maintained, is about 20 years.
The installation of water barrels in Talat Merghen village. Copyright: Laila Mandi
The method could help recycle water in arid regions, such as the North African and Asian deserts, where water preservation is crucial for farmers and expensive, industrial water purification is not available.
The researchers worked with the people of Talat Merghen village to test the prototypes. They collected domestic waste water from 72 people in eight households. The water was stored in a holding tank, from where it was first fed into a settling tank – to separate sediment and silt – and then into the two-stage filter system.
Once optimised for flow load, the system removed around 90 per cent of pollutants, including around 95 per cent of nitrogen, a fertiliser residue. The filtered water was not safe to drink, but was usable for agricultural irrigation and household chores. It could be made potable with additional treatment, such as chlorination or UV light, Mandi said.
However, the system would struggle with dangerous chemical pollution, like heavy metals and the more resistant waterborne pathogens such as cholera and salmonella, says Helmy Zanfaly, a researcher at Egypt’s National Research Centre in Cairo. “There is a need for an added disinfection process with chlorine, for example, which adds some disadvantage to the technology,” he says.
Zanfaly also expressed concern about algae growth in the filter, especially in high temperatures. “The filter media should be backwashed or changed after some time, because any biofilm that forms will cause clogging,” he said.
In their paper, the researchers admit that clogging is a problem but say the size and surface of the gravel into which the filter bricks are laid could reduce the growth of algae.
Leah Boutilier, a researcher at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada, said the prototype might also need further refining to ensure the soil used for the bricks allows enough water to pass. This, she said, is important in order to replicate the system elsewhere.
"Soil hydraulic conductivity can be highly variable and this will impact the ability for the filter to accept and filter sewage for the long-term," she said.